Friday, September 26, 2008

HAZMAT Wash Down Berms

HOW LONG HAS BASIC CONCEPTS BEEN
MANUFACTURING WASH DOWN BERMS?


As you can see from this archived copy of Pollution Equipment News dated April 1991 issue #24 page 63, Basic Concepts has been building berms for wash down applications for over 17 years. Pictured in the photo above is Basic Concepts’ founder Edward Van Romer’s son who ran a distributorship of Basic Concepts’ products in Denver, CO under the name Solution Control Systems. And the rest is history…

About Basic Concepts
Basic Concepts is a World War II veteran owned small business that manufactures environmental spill containment products. Founded in 1988, the company is celebrating its 20th year of serving a global market one customer at a time. Want to know more about Basic Concepts and its full line of secondary containment berms and oil spill products? Please contact Basic Concepts, Inc, 1310 Harris Bridge Rd, Anderson, SC 29621, telephone 1-800-285-4203 or visit the company website at www.basicconcepts.com

Decon Berms in use at Dirksen Senate Building


September 22, 2008

With recent events bringing the 2001 Anthrax attack on the capital back into the headlines, several archived AP photos have been printed in USA Today and Newsweek as well as a Getty Image in Life Magazine that showcase the Sentry Quickberm in use as a decon wash down berm. Pictured above are hazmat worker going through personnel decon outside of the Dirksen Senate building.

Basic Concepts is proud to manufacture products that assists men and women in the service of our country do their jobs in a safer manner. Basic Concepts is a World War II veteran owned small business that manufactures environmental spill containment products. Founded in 1988, the company is celebrating its 20th year of serving a global market one customer at a time. Want to know more about Basic Concepts and its full line of secondary containment berms and oil spill products? Please contact Basic Concepts, Inc, 1310 Harris Bridge Rd, Anderson, SC 29621, telephone 1-800-285-4203 or visit the company website at www.basicconcepts.com.

Timeline of a Hazmat Response

How events unfolded: Chemical leak timeline

Seed Newsvine By KIETRYN ZYCHAL

Pocono Record Writer

January 13, 2008

"You tell the people of Monroe County that they should be very proud of their emergency responders," said Charles Decker, director of environmental health and security at Vertellus Health and Specialty Products, the site of an early-morning chemical spill in the Delaware Water Gap. "I have national responsibility for this company and I can tell you that the people here today are professional to the nth degree."

Decker's sentiments were echoed by division president Robert Molino.

Related Stories
Water Gap evacuated: Chemical leak ousts residents; no one hurt (with video) "This incident was handled very quickly and efficiently. This is a first class operation," he said. "I can't stress enough how grateful we are that no one was injured. And we apologize to the community for disrupting their Saturday, but there was a lot of flammable material and the fire chief felt they didn't want to risk having anyone here in the event the chemical was ignited."

Scott Turner is president and CEO of HMHTTC Response Inc. of Mount Arlington, N.J., the hazardous materials cleanup company contracted by Vertellus to handle chemical emergencies at its Delaware Water Gap plant. HMHTTC Response cleans chemical spills all over the United States. His business card reads "Masters of Disaster." When asked about the seriousness of this spill, Turner responded, "Initially, it was Level A, requiring the team to wear fully encapsulated suits. Later, it was downgraded to Level B."

When asked how local emergency responders compared to others across the country, he said, "You can't compare response teams in areas as different as Los Angeles, Chicago and the Poconos. But, I can tell you that this team was excellent. They spared no time in getting manpower and vehicles and equipment here. And they joined into a unified command and very wisely decided to let us handle our piece of the response," he said. When asked to clarify what he meant, Turner said, "For instance, in Chicago, they call the shots on everything." Turner said his company handles 3,000 calls a year nationwide from small incidents to heavy industrial spills like the recent oil spill in San Francisco. His clients include the top 100 trucking firms and eight of the top 10 tanker companies as well as railroads.

Timeline of the emergency spill response:


7:50 a.m. Vertellus employees place a 911 call to report a chemical spill and notify their private contractor, HMHTTC.
7:51 a.m. Bruce Henry, deputy director of the Monroe County Office of Emergency Management is listening to the police scanner at home in Tobyhanna when he receives the call from the 911 center. On the way to the Delaware Water Gap, Henry speaks to the Monroe County hazmat team to determine if the county or a private company will handle the chemical spill.

911 Center places a call to Delaware Water Gap Fire Company. DWG requests assistance from Shawnee, Marshall's Creek Fire Company and Stroud Township. Marshall's Creek has a truck with 3,000 feet of five-inch hose, which will be used for pumping water from Cherry Creek at the intersection of Route 611 and Broad Street to the spill site. Stroud Township supplies a command unit — a trailer utilized for meetings to coordinate the response. Suburban Ambulance is called to the scene. Dr. Robert Wallen, on staff at Pocono Medical Center and medical adviser to the Red Cross is called.


7:55 a.m. Henry, en route, calls Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection in Wilkes-Barre to request assistance from their emergency response people.
After 8 a.m. Howard Ike, chief of the Delaware Water Gap Fire Company, instructs firefighters to evacuate residents of Delaware Water Gap.

Dr. Wallen contacts Red Cross volunteers to prepare to set up emergency shelters.

Monroe County Transit Authority is called to bring buses to the Interstate 80 Welcome Center for transport of evacuated residents.

Martz Bus Co. is instructed to reroute buses away from Delaware Water Gap bus terminal.


8:20 a.m. Henry arrives on scene. First responders of HMHTTC arrive to assess situation.
By 9:30 a.m. Two trailers from HMHTTC arrive with equipment. Volunteers and staff are at Red Cross headquarters. Shelters are set up at two schools, Smithfield Elementary and Stroudsburg High School. Residents have been evacuated. Salvation Army canteen sets up in staging area to provide snacks and water for firefighters.
9:30 a.m. Tobyhanna Army Depot's fire company sends a vehicle and an EMT to each emergency shelter.
10 a.m. HMHTTC, wearing Level A protection, assesses leak. It is determined that foam will be needed to suppress vapor from the chemical in the concrete containment pit beneath the tanks. Blue Ridge Fire Chief, Leon Clapper, brings a trailer from the Public Safety Center in Snydersville specifically equipped for Foam suppression. Lackawanna County also sends a foam equippped trailer as a back up.
Noon. Executives from Vertellus arrive on scene.
1-2 p.m. After HMHTTC concludes its inspection, foam is sprayed on pit beneath tank by volunteer firefighters wearing full protective gear.
2:30 p.m. Stroudsburg High shelter shuts down. Smithfield remains open.
3 p.m. HMHTTC vacuums liquid out of containment pit into storage tank.
4 p.m. Most of liquid has been removed from containment pit. Solid chemicals are removed after liquid.
5 p.m. Decontamination of firefighters who had contact with the chemical spill.
6 p.m. Residents return to homes. Emergency responders leave scene. HMHTTC employees remain to complete shutdown of site.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

HAZMAT Crew Utilized in Road Spill

HAZMAT spill temporarily closes the Midtown Tunnel Saturday

Updated: May 14, 2007 02:00 PM EDT
Commuters ran into trouble at the Midtown Tunnel early on Saturday.
The tunnel was closed for nearly five hours as HAZMAT crews cleaned up a hydrochloric acid spill.

The trail of hazardous material ran through the Midtown Tunnel and caused a trail of traffic to back up for hours.

"There was no crash. There was a load shift. One of the drums got cracked on the bottom and was leaking hydrochloric acid," explained Cheif Bruce Evans of the Norfolk Fire Department.
25 total gallons leaked from the truck. According to investigators the driver of the tractor trailer did not stop at the inspection station on the Portsmouth side of the tunnel prior to driving through. The truck was hauling three 55 gallon drums of hydrochloric acid and one drum of sodium hydroxide.

"Basic problems with hydrochloric acid is it's an irritant, it's an inhalation hazard, it's corrosive to the mucus membrane and liquidy tissues like the eyes, throat, things like that," said Evans.
Firefighters used an absorbant material to soak up the mess outside. The acid inside the tube will get special attention.

"They have a containment system for any runoff inside the tunnel, so that product will be contained within systems of the Midtown Tunnel," said Evans.

Fire officials said the driver faces four misdeamnor charges for having an improperly marked vehicle. State police may also file additional charges.

No one was hurt.

No Hazmat Job Too Big




September 24, 2008


I thought it would be appropriate to go back into the archives and pull up this equipment decon application. Pictured at right is a C140 plane in use by the U.S. Air Force. It flies missions all over the world where it risks being exposed to radiological and biological weapons. After such missions, it returns to base for decon in a 180'x180' Sentry Quickberm. Both equipment and personnel wash down are important aspects of proper hazmat decon.

Hazmat Response Unit Utilizing New Equipment

Reposted from: New Iberia Parish Haz Mat Response Unit
KLFY - Lafayette,LA,USA
and No Spill Zone

New Iberia Parish Haz Mat Response Unit
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 01:36 PM EST

Quicker response times. That’s what the Fire Chief says Iberia Parish will see now that their Fire Department has their own Haz-Mat spill Response Unit.
Fire Chief Chad Sonnier Says: ”In the past it would take an hour and a half of response time before they’ve even made it on the scene for search and rescue efforts to begin. Now, with this truck in service we’ll have rescue efforts underway with in 10 minutes after dispatch.”
The unit was first used when a Navy training jet crashed near the Acadiana Regional Airport. Using things like special absorbent pads and containment booms, Firefighters soaked up leaking jet fuel. Because of this equipment, the Fire Chief tells us the spill had a zero percent impact on the environment.

The unit has things like splash suits. They cover the entire body and protect Firefighters from chemical exposure. Special equipment like Spill Blocker Dikes can connect to form a perimeter on land to contain chemicals. The same can be done on water with BoomDikes. The unit even contains special blockers to fit over drains to keep chemicals from leaking through.
Fire Chief Chad Sonnier tells us since July his Department has received eight calls for flammable liquids spills. Before this new unit was established, the Parish was able to get private companies to respond to seven of those spills. At the latest spill the Department was able to successfully respond to with their new equipment.

Hazmat Survival Tips: Stages of a Hazardous Material Incident

Haz-Mat Survival Tips: Stages of a Hazardous Materials Incident

Beyond the Rule of Thumb
Survival Tip 23

By Steven De Lisi

Hazardous materials generally present little threat to first responders and those who handle the material unless there is an unintended breach of a container resulting in a release of the material. Containers of hazardous materials are typically breached as a result of internal pressure created by exposure to excessive heat; a chemical reaction of the contents that causes an increase in pressure or deterioration of the container; or mechanical damage, such as when a container strikes an object with force or it is struck by another object, as when punctured by a forklift blade.

Regardless of the type of stress applied to a container, first responders will find that hazardous-materials incidents can often be divided into three stages, each stage with its own unique challenges. These stages are

Containers with an on-going release

Containers with the potential to release their contents

Containers that have already released their contents

Determining the stage of a hazardous-materials incident should be included during the initial size-up and hazard assessment by those first to arrive at the scene of a hazardous-materials incident. By doing so, first responders will be better able to determine just how aggressive they should be in attempting to manage the incident. For example, incidents involving a container with an ongoing release may require quick action to contain the spilled material, whereas those involving containers exposed to heat or a chemical reaction with the potential to release their contents (often as a result of the container's bursting) may require a rapid evacuation of all persons in the affected area. However, when dealing with incidents involving containers that have already released their contents prior to the arrival of first responders, there may be little that they need to do to improve the situation other than to isolate and deny entry to the spill area.

Although there are specific concerns for each stage of a hazardous-materials incident, first responders should remember that the stage can change throughout the course of an event, thereby presenting a combination of challenges to the safe handling of the incident.

Containers with an ongoing release

Incidents involving containers with an ongoing release may be the result of mechanical damage to the container or valves, or exposure to heat, which has activated a pressure relief device. In this stage, first responders are faced with three considerations:

Behavior of the hazardous material based upon its physical state.

Stopping the release.

Containing the release.

The physical state of a hazardous material may be solid, liquid, or gas. For first responders, a gas is the most difficult form of material to deal with since containment, especially outdoors, is difficult. However, solids and liquids can create dust and vapors respectively, and they present the same containment difficulties as any gas.

To contain the release of liquids, first responders are usually taught how to construct temporary barriers using soil, granular absorbents, or specially designed absorbent booms. When using any of this containment equipment, the following questions must be asked:

Is containment equipment available at the scene?

Will the containment medium react with the hazardous material?

How much material has already been released?

How much more material will continue to be released?

The importance of estimating the size of the release is critical to ensure that containment areas are of adequate capacity. For example, retention basins created to contain the release of a liquid hazardous material may need to be pumped out during the course of an incident to avoid overflowing. Remember that the time to order a vacuum truck for this purpose is long before the liquid reaches the top of the basin.

When dealing with cargo tanks, some first responders may assume that all have multiple compartments, so that a tear in one compartment will result in a release from only that section of the tank. However, some cargo tanks may be what are sometimes referred to as a "single shot" tank, meaning that the tank is open from end to end and a breach in any one portion of the tank could result in the release of the entire contents.

The release of a liquid from a container will usually subside when the level of the liquid reaches the level of the breach. Although some first responders may then assume that the leak may then subside, the reality is that as the liquid level in a container changes, the center of gravity changes as well. For containers resting solidly on level ground, this is of no consequence. However, for those found in an unstable configuration, such as a cargo tank that has overturned down an embankment, the position of the container may shift as the liquid level drops, thereby continuing to lower the breach below the liquid level and allowing the container to leak long after first responders believed it would stop.

The potential for some containers of hazardous materials to shift position during an incident can pose a severe threat to first responders working nearby. In these situations, it is important to stabilize containers. This can be accomplished with wooden blocks for individual containers such as drums or securing large vehicles with cables from a wrecker truck or crane.

Access to containment equipment is often a challenge for first responders. For many departments, this equipment is normally not carried on first-due apparatus but is often relegated to a small trailer or special utility truck. Unfortunately, the arrival of these trucks and trailers is usually delayed, forcing first responders to use makeshift means for containment.

In the absence of absorbent booms, you can sometimes construct an underflow dam by using a small section of plastic pipe, but since this pipe is likely carried on the same truck or trailer as the booms, you may have to use a section of hard suction hose instead. Always remember that, for booms or underflow dams to be effective, the hazardous material to be contained must not mix with water and it must float on the surface.

Containers with the potential to release their contents

Containers of hazardous materials that have not released their contents do not normally present a danger to first responders unless there is the threat of a chemical, thermal, or mechanical stress that can affect the integrity of the container. Potential sources of mechanical stress include situations such as the structural collapse of a building, a tank resting in an unstable position with the potential to fall, or first responders handling a container. As mentioned previously, chemical and thermal stress can increase internal pressure; and if the container is not equipped with a pressure-relief device, as is the case with most containers of liquids, the increase in pressure can cause the container to burst with great force.

Remember that thermal stress is not just the result of exposure to fire, but also can be caused by ambient temperature and exposure to direct sunlight. Depending on the location of the incident and the time of year, there can be wide fluctuations of outdoor temperatures during the course of an incident.

There can always be a combination of stressors acting on a container, and they can present unique hazards to first responders. In particular, a container that has already been weakened by mechanical damage may fail sooner if subjected to an increase in internal pressure from subsequent chemical or thermal stress.

For containers equipped with a pressure-relief device, there may be less of a chance of the container's exploding from this excessive internal pressure. However, the effectiveness of a pressure-relief device may be compromised by mechanical stress to the container, since the amount of pressure a damaged container can withstand may be less than the setting of the pressure-relief device, meaning that the container may burst before the pressure-relief device opens--or even while the device is in operation.

Chemical stress includes situations in which certain types of corrosive material stored in lined metal containers attack the container wall because of lining failure. Chemical stress can also occur when certain materials are mixed, such as when employees in the act of disposing of hazardous waste place material in the wrong container or when a rail car containing a small amount of liquid residue is filled with another, incompatible material.

Thermal stress can sometimes be relieved by cooling containers with water or moving them from the source of heat exposure. You must first consider the potential of hazards to first responders should the containers burst before undertaking these activities. In some situations, first responders may instead decide that a retreat to safety is in order.

Likewise, removing all persons from an affected area may be the best approach when dealing with containers subject to chemical stress, since there is most likely very little first responders can do to correct the situation. Allowing the container to burst with all persons withdrawn from the area or waiting for the chemical stress to relieve itself may be the only ways to safely stop the increase of internal pressure.

Containers that have already released their contents

Incidents in which containers have released their entire contents prior to the arrival of first responders usually involve small containers such as those intended for use by consumers. Examples include one-gallon and five-gallon containers, paper bags, plastic containers, and cardboard boxes. Since they are intended for ease of handling, the volume and weight are usually limited, yet the very fact that these containers are designed to be handled invites the potential for them to be dropped or otherwise exposed to mechanical stress.

These incidents typically result in a relatively small release of product when compared to bulk tanks, yet first responders must remember that five gallons of material can still have a significant impact--for example, if it were spilled into a waterway. Likewise, a jar of pesticide concentrate may contain very little product, yet the potential for extreme toxicity is a real threat that cannot be underestimated because of the small size of the release.

There are two advantages to first responders when dealing with containers that have already released their contents: (1) They can usually visualize the amount of material released and are therefore are better able to estimate potential exposure and determine the size of a containment area; (2) there is no need to deal with the hazards of an ongoing release or an incident with a potential for release mentioned previously. Furthermore, unless the material is migrating from the incident scene, such as on a sloped surface moving towards a drain, there may be little first responders need to do to contain the material. Of course, although some first responders may be content with this fact, remember that incidents occurring outdoors are subject to environmental factors, most notably rain, and that a sudden storm moving through an area can turn a relatively minor spill involving five gallons of paint into a fast-moving nightmare that needs to be contained in a manner that is no different than handling an ongoing release from a cargo tank.

The stage of a hazardous-materials incident should always be a factor when determining the level of involvement of first responders attempting to resolve the incident. Of all the stages, remember that the most critical is the one in which first responders are faced with a container without an active release on arrival. All too often, first responders may be lulled into a false sense of security, yet there may be disastrous consequences unless they determine early in the incident the potential for the container to release its contents and take the appropriate steps to protect themselves and the public.

Click here for more info on Steven De Lisi's book, Hazardous Materials Incidents: Surviving the Initial Response.

Steven M. De Lisi retired after a fire service career spanning 27 years that included serving as a regional training manager for the Virginia Department of Fire Programs (VDFP) and most recently as the deputy chief for the Virginia Air Guard Fire Rescue. De Lisi is a hazardous materials specialist; he continues to coordinate a statewide training program for the investigation of environmental crimes as an adjunct instructor for VDFP. De Lisi began his career in hazardous-materials response in 1982 as a member of the hazmat team with the Newport News (VA) Fire Department. Since then, he has also served as a hazardous materials officer for the Virginia Department of Emergency Management; in that capacity, he provided on-scene assistance to first responders involved with hazardous-materials incidents in an area that included more than 20 local jurisdictions.

December 23, 2007